Over the last couple of weeks I have been thinking about what truly makes a crisis. It seems like everyday there is a new crisis to be consumed, deconstructed and analyzed. Then I came across an article on The Wall Street Journal online titled the Short Life of a PR Nightmare that discusses the rapid nature of a crisis and how fast it can fade away. It got me thinking about some of the incidents that are pegged as a “crisis” today. Are they really a crisis or are they something closer to an inconvenience, an embarrassment or a gaffe? Cases like Penn State, the Costa Concorida crash, Toyota’s sticking gas pedal and even Taco Bell’s meatless meat taco should be considered real crises and treated as such. But should every slip be considered a crisis?
Let consider two recent incidents. Who can forget the short-lived fuss made about President Obama talking about having “more flexibility after the election” into an open microphone? Was this a crisis, a gaffe or an intentional signal being sent from a President who knows his way around a live microphone? We may never know. What we do know is that it wasn’t a crisis. Or, how about Romney Senior Advisor Eric Fehrnstrom’s “Etch A Sketch” moment? This certainly wasn’t a crisis, heck it wasn’t even a crisis in the campaign world but the media treated it like it was. The public and the media love a crisis and both enjoy making hay out of another’s embarrassing moment for sport and to fulfill our appetite for schadenfreude. It is almost as if having a crisis has become stylish. Yes, stylish and to prove my point ABC just launched a new show about crisis communicators called Scandal that glamorizes the work.
The problem with labeling everything a crisis is that crisis becomes the norm and we don’t even react to real crises anymore. Soon we’ll find ourselves in a society where we storm, pout and even mourn for five minutes on social media about the crisis of the moment and then we’ll move on.
Oh, wait we are already there.

