Posted by: Emily Priebe | October 7, 2013

Native Advertising

Advertising is going native. Integrated content tactics continue to play a larger and more influential role on capturing consumer attention. Native advertising integrates advertorial content alongside a website’s existing content, usually in ways that can be hard to detect by readers. It’s not uncommon that I will find myself reading a piece of content online and get halfway through it before I realize it’s a sponsored article or post.

Buzzfeed is the king of native advertising platforms. More than 700 advertisers use Buzzfeed to publish content, and native advertising packages can garner up to a $100,000 price tag. For many consumers, the quirky list posts with funny gifs and Vines created by advertisers are just as shareable as similar pieces of content written by Buzzfeed staff. And when it’s done well, many consumers like myself won’t see the difference.

Although the metrics for success on native advertising are still being hammered out, brands that use the strategy masterfully may see an increase in their brand awareness if the piece of content is particularly shareable and drives engagement. Or is that success moot if consumers don’t even realize that they are reading sponsored content?

Like many integrated marketing strategies, when used in the wrong context, both brands and the content platforms they are advertising on can see backlash against native advertising as the example of The Atlantic illustrates in this article from Mashable. The question is at what point does native advertising content cross the line for the reader in the context of their experience?

 

Posted by: lorihowell | October 7, 2013

Modern Media Relations

The 13 newest members of the University of Oregon Strategic Communication Master’s Program have been getting to know one another over the past two weeks, swapping stories and sharing their backgrounds, including experience in:

-> Science
-> Education
-> Environmental Stewardship
-> Healthcare
-> Journalism
-> Storytelling
-> Philanthropy

This is a solid group, set on using their diverse backgrounds and impressive professional experience to make the planet a better place.

It would be hard to find fault with these values, yet, there continues to be a perception problem in our field—at least in the area of public relations. In “Examining Modern Media Relations: An Exploratory Study of the Effect of Twitter on the Public Relations – Journalist Relationship,” Wilson, D. and Supa, D. (2013) document the discrepancy between the way public relations professionals perceive themselves (as pointed out in Table 1: Journalists and Practitioners Relationship Views) and how they are perceived in the eyes of journalists; more often, journalists think PR pros can be pests.

Do you think this perception problem is limited to public relations professionals and journalists, or that it also exists for other communications roles, like public information officers and communications directors? How can it be challenged?

(Placeholder) Post 1 - Oct - 2013Pictured above, from left to right, are the 2013 students of the University of Oregon Strategic Communication Master’s Program and two faculty: Jamie Schaub, Professor Kim Sheehan, Melissa De Lyser, Lori Howell, Kevin Hartman, Lindsey Newkirk, Kevin Gaboury, Michael Plett, Katherine Pokrass, Joel Arellano, Emily Priebe, Scott Anderson, Natalie Henry Bennon, Stephen Wheeler, and Professor Donna Davis. Photo courtesy of Kellee Weinhold, University of Oregon.

Learn more about the students at uoregon.edu http://journalism.uoregon.edu/graduate/current-strat-comm-students

Posted by: graceroxasmorrissey | October 6, 2013

A Communications Divide

The communications landscape being re-shaped by digital tools and Web 2.0 seems to be shifting far ahead of our ability as media practitioners to comprehend each new lay of the land.  As the thought pieces on Comic-con marketing and online advertising (“The Future of Advertising Will Be Integrated”) indicate, technology and consumer behavior now constantly play off each other at a dizzying pace, leading to such new-fangled conditions such as “banner blindness,” for example.

In PR, where the correlation of output to result is a bit more slippery, there seems to be a wider gap in perception and knowledge about the value of social and emerging media.  In Wright and Hinson’s study, it’s quite revealing that although the use or intent to use of social media for PR continue to rise, only 43 percent of the organizations actually using them has done any analysis of their efforts. Of these, a majority (61 percent) are simple output measurements as opposed to more insightful outcome analyses.

Is it any wonder that, Twitter, for all its highly touted potentials in media relations, is not being taken up as fast as it should be — at least according to Wilson & Supa’s study —  by journalists and PR practitioners alike? (Although the lack of age-related data on this study dictates caution in interpreting it). It isn’t helping Twitter’s cause that the study also seems to indicate that it probably won’t change the essential, age-old dynamic of wary, sometimes even hostile, engagement in journalist-PR interaction.

Posted by: Melissa De Lyser | October 5, 2013

Effect of Twitter on Public Relations for Oct. 7

While I’m not suggesting that Wilson & Supa’s research is invalid, I’m curious to know how survey respondents defined “use” of Twitter.  In social media, the word “use” is almost as ambiguous as “engagement.”  What defines use?

Consider this example: A journalist skims his/her Twitter feed four times daily.  He/she never clicks on anything and never tweets.  However, he/she does pick up story ideas from PR tweets that he later follows up on.  Is he “using” Twitter for media relations?  I say yes.  However, I know journalists who say no.

Why would a journalist so narrowly define Twitter use?  Anecdotally, I think more traditional journalists are reluctant to admit to using a source that doesn’t have the fact-checking, editor-controlled aspects of the AP newswire.  Journalists would scan the AP wires looking for story ideas much like they now scan Twitter. I don’t think there’s much difference.  But those who started their careers before the Internet may feel differently about admitting that they use 40-character phrases to develop story ideas.

In addition, is there a perception that Twitter has become the new PR Newswire?  PR Newswire, while used by journalists, felt advertorial, in that it was biased and self-promoting.  As Wilson & Supa mentioned, there’s definitely a sense of that with Twitter, too, when it comes to media relations.  Are journalists reluctant to admit how much they use on Twitter as a result?

Posted by: kelliroesch | June 7, 2013

I like you in real life better!

Have you ever liked a friend in person, but find when you follow them on social media they are, how do we say this politely, different? They’re so different online that you wonder which is the real person, the electronic version or the human version? How about the friend who practically shouts  online how much they can’t wait for the day to be over while they are standing right next to you. What about the humble bragger that exclaims that they are being hit on all of the time and it’s #soannoying! Even though the elections are over, we can all probably recall at least one person on Social Media who vehemently opposed or supported one candidate, but in real life you wouldn’t hear a peep about it.

These and other twists of Social Media social encounters are featured on a video aptly named “I like you in real life (but not on the internet)” probably strikes a chord with anyone who knows someone whose Social Media life and their real life don’t quite match up.

Unfriending doesn’t always work, it’s likely they will notice and bring it up. Blocking doesn’t work because they’ll ask you if you saw their status update. You’re kinda stuck.

When  research catches up with the ever-changing Social Media platforms, it would be an interesting study to understand why people act so different online from the people they encounter on a regular basis.

Until then, enjoy the fifth “selfie” portrait of your co-worker today!

Posted by: ARNoack | June 7, 2013

New Alternative Fuel: Social Media

This is awesome! A car powered by social media!

Minddrive is non-profit organization that provides an afterschool program for at-risk youth that teaches kids about math, science, and engineering through hands-on projects. This year’s project was the restoration and electrification of a 1967 Karmann Ghia. Kids and volunteers worked to completely restore the tired old car and convert the drivetrain to battery power. The car’s most interesting feature is a system that energizes the battery via social media. Each new Twitter follower gives the car five watts of juice; a like on Facebook, one watt; and shares, retweets, or mentions on Twitter net an additional three. Minddrive’s goal with the Karmann Ghia project was to drive from Kansas City to Washington, D.C. to raise awareness for the organization and the benefits of hands-on projects for at-risk youth. In a Kansas City test run, the car received enough social media fuel to make it far beyond Washington. Just today the car finished the more than 1,000-mile trek to D.C. What a fascinating way to drive social media forward!

Posted by: karlcd | June 6, 2013

Data Mining

Three months ago Facebook added “Graph Search” to my Facebook account and I was so excited.   Facebook  hyped this search engine as a way to find any post from you or your friends, but after 5 minutes of trying to out I was very disappointed and have not used it since.

After thinking the amount of data generated on Facebook I began to understand how difficult it is to find that one thing you are looking for. That is when I started to appreciate Twitter. With Twitter’s hastags and public posts it is very easy to search for people, ideas, conversations and topics.  What makes searching Twitter easy is not the search engine, but the fact when people post to Twitter they are consciously thinking about how others are going to find their posts.  In order to try to get your post seen and re-Tweeted you include names with the @ symbol  or use a hastag such as #uomsc.

In the past I have expected that Google, Yahoo or Bing would be able to find what I am searching for, but now that I am starting to create data for the web I realize it is my responsibility to make sure this new data can be easily found when people searching for it. So far i think of off to a good start. #datamining

Posted by: Nathan Dinsdale | June 6, 2013

The Hybrid Theory

A lingering thought of mine is how theory transfers into practice and the academic translates into the professional. The lines blur, undoubtedly, but it can get messy when the definition of “research” is turned into pulp on the open market. 

If everyone with an iPhone is potentially a “citizen journalist,” many also purport to conduct qualitative research without the rigor and transparency routinely found in academia. Conversely, academic research is often too arcane to resonate on a broader scale.

As we’ve made our way through the qualitative research methods course, I’ve been looking for a hybrid that pulls together the substance of qualitative and quantitative research with the compelling style of real-world strategic communication that bridges between classroom and conference room. 

I’m not sure that I’ve found it. But what I did come across was an intriguing example of how those elements can come together: A hot-off-the-presses “The State of Men” report from JWT, the self-regarded “world’s best-known marketing communications brand” (which I’d never heard of). While the validity of the methodology could be questioned, there is a methodology (quantitative survey and qualitative interviewing). The result is a confluence of data, analysis and stylistic flair that lands somewhere between research, marketing and checkout stand grist (the word “mancession” is used). Nevertheless, it provides fodder for communication inquiry, brand insight, cultural analysis and a kind of pop ethnography.

Even with its faults, I think it shows that academic-style research and professional application can coexist in a compelling manner.  

Posted by: corrinebuchanan | June 6, 2013

The life of a researcher…

For my last blog of this term, I thought I would share with you this TED talk by qualitative researcher and self-proclaimed story-teller Brené Brown. Brown has this beautiful way of connecting stories with information saying, “Maybe stories are just data with a soul.” What really struck me about this talk was Brown’s passion for her research. I thought this was a great example of what it means to be a qualitative researcher and how, even as researchers we can get consumed and changed by our research and sometimes, it takes a lot of control to let go of our expectations and biases.

After watching Brown, I saw a glimpse into our futures as researchers and communication professionals. The data we uncover truly has the power to transforms companies, policies, and lives. Not only is Brown a passionate and determined researcher, her findings are pretty incredible too.

Enjoy!

Brené Brown: The power of vulnerability

Posted by: ellenpayne2012 | June 3, 2013

If I ran the zoo

“I’ll bring back a Gusset, a Gherkin, a Gasket

And also a Gootch from the wilds of Nantasket.

And eight Persian Princesses will carry the basket,

But what their names are, I don’t know so I don’t ask it.”

With apologies to Dr. Seuss, in this age of unlimited data, I sometimes wonder whose running this zoo — even as I marvel at it. “Oh the places you’ll go,” he promised.

In this Sunday’s New York Times, Jenn Wortham talks about a family shouting match her sister and mother got into, not with each other, but with the IPhone’s navigation system. My friends forbade me from talking to Siri recently because of the vitriol I direct at her when she mishears me.  

Work is underway at the MIT Media Lab, says Wortham, on software that recognizes human emotions through patterns of speech and tone of voice to determine qualities like arrogance or annoyance. If big brother is watching each click already, imagine how invasive it will be when it’s reading our emotions.

This of course brings up enormous ethical and privacy concerns, which we need to navigate. So in the words of Dr. Seuss, “Your off to Great Places! You’re off and away! You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any direction you choose. You’re on your own. And you know what you know. And YOU are the guy who’ll decide where to go.”

 

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories