Posted by: nallen123 | April 10, 2013

Is “Online Privacy” an Oxymoron?

Eysenbach and Till’s 2001 article “Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities” raises a critical question for qualitative researchers and participants of online forums alike: where is the line between “public” and “private” community spaces on the internet?

Consciously living in a cyber-saturated world, I have learned that online content can never truly be deleted (as ensured by The Wayback Machine), and as such, nothing one posts online can truly be private. But this viewpoint, while perhaps technically accurate, does not accommodate the very private – and very real – spaces where confidential support groups regularly deal with highly sensitive, personal issues like addiction, depression or terminal illness.

For researchers, observing online support groups like these could easily seem akin to watching a group of people interact in a public place – since it can be argued that the internet is a sort of public place. However, the difference lies simply in whether the group being observed is aware of the researcher’s listening ear. In the case of in-person interactions, it is obvious where the line between observing and eavesdropping exists. While experientially that line seems blurrier online than in person, in reality it is not. As Eysenbach and Till point out, participants of subscription-based discussion groups are likely to regard the group as a “private place” and trust that anyone in the “room” is open to a similar level of vulnerability. It is the ethical obligation of the researcher to respect individuals’ privacy online in the same way they would face-to-face. 

Advertisements

Responses

  1. I deal with this issue every day Nicole. As a university researcher, the folks I’m interacting with must know who I am, where I am, and what their protections are. Yet, I also am keenly aware of people who present themselves as researchers in the virtual world I am working in who, in reality, are not affiliated with any organization and are not required to provide any protection. They may not have any legitimate research agenda. Sadly, it’s up to the person that is sharing the information to be savvy enough to know what to share and not to share and with whom. Too often, they have no clue (not too unlike people who post so much personal information on public social sites). Ughh…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: